Prediction of Raul Antonio Viver vs Bruce Foxworth Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
R. Antonio Viver vs B. Foxworth

Raul Antonio Viver

ECU

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Bruce Foxworth

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Viver 1 - 0 Foxworth

They have played 2 sets in total, with Raul Antonio Viver winning 2 and Bruce Foxworth winning 0. The last match between Raul Antonio Viver and Bruce Foxworth was at the Brescia CH, 11-06-1984, Round: R4, Surface: Clay, with Raul Antonio Viver getting the victory 6-2 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Viver	1
Foxworth	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R4) Brescia CH(06-11-84)

Stats

Raul Antonio Viver

Bruce Foxworth

R. A. Viver vs B. Foxworth H2H Profile

R. A. Viver	Stats	B. Foxworth
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
48.18% (106-114)	Career Total W/L	44.30% (35-44)
1	Clay	0
1	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

R. A. Viver vs B. Foxworth Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Raul Antonio Viver has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Bruce Foxworth has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Raul Antonio Viver, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bruce Foxworth has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Raul Antonio Viver has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bruce Foxworth has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Raul Antonio Viver has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Bruce Foxworth winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Raul Antonio Viver has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 103/102), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Bruce Foxworth has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 25/26), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
Player level: In the last year, Raul Antonio Viver has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Bruce Foxworth has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Raul Antonio Viver winning 1 times and Bruce Foxworth being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Raul Antonio Viver winning 2 and Bruce Foxworth winning 0.
The last match between Raul Antonio Viver and Bruce Foxworth was at the Brescia CH, 11-06-1984, Round: R4, Surface: Clay, with Raul Antonio Viver getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Raul Antonio Viver has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Bruce Foxworth has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Raul Antonio Viver has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bruce Foxworth has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Raul Antonio Viver has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bruce Foxworth has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Raul Antonio Viver vs Bruce Foxworth Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

R. A. Viver vs B. Foxworth H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

R. A. Viver	Stats	B. Foxworth
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	5
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

R. A. Viver Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Messina CH - 18-09-1989
QF Marc RossetM. Rosset	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
R4 Hans SchwaierH. Schwaier	W	6-3 6-2	Stats
R3 Gilad BloomG. Bloom	W	6-1 6-1	Stats
Madrid - 11-09-1989
R3 Agustin MorenoA. Moreno	L	7-5 6-3	Stats
Genova CH - 04-09-1989
R4 Pablo AlbanoP. Albano	L	6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

B. Foxworth Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Jakarta CH - 02-11-1987
R3 Tom ToomeyT. Toomey	W	5-7 6-4 6-3	Stats
R4 Suharyadi SuharyadiS. Suharyadi	L	6-4 7-5	Stats
Berkeley CH - 21-07-1986
R4 Mike BauerM. Bauer	L	7-5 6-3	Stats
R3 Gary NieburG. Niebur	W	6-4 4-6 6-0	Stats
West Palm CH - 23-09-1985
R3 Bruce BresciaB. Brescia	W	2-6 6-2 6-4	Stats

View All

R. A. Viver vs B. Foxworth Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

R. A. Viver	Stats	B. Foxworth
48.18% (106/114)	YTD Win/Loss	44.30% (35/44)
49.33% (259/266)	Sets Win/Loss	44.78% (90/111)
50.69% (2503/2435)	Games Win/Loss	48.33% (925/989)
20.00% (2/8)	Hard Win/Loss	40.00% (10/15)
50.24% (103/102)	Clay Win/Loss	49.02% (25/26)
25.00% (1/3)	Indoor Hard W/L	0.00% (0/1)
0.00% (0/1)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/2)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
0.58	Average Opponent Rank	595.41
25.00% (1/3)	Slam W/L	28.57% (2/5)
0.00% (0/1)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
60.87% (14/9)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
33.33% (19/38)	Main Tour W/L	40.00% (6/9)
53.33% (72/63)	Challenger W/L	47.37% (27/30)
48% (96/200)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	46% (33/72)
44% (8/18)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	29% (2/7)
38% (23/61)	Deciding Set Win %	53% (17/32)
81% (109/88)	1st Set Won, Won Match	74% (31/23)
19% (109/21)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	26% (31/8)
15% (110/17)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	25% (48/12)